Askel Ventures — Investment Committee Memo  ·  Confidential  ·  April 2026

Auran Pesupojat Oy

Cleaning & laundry services  ·  Turku, Finland  ·  Y-tunnus 0934595-3  ·  Est. 2015
Recommendation
Proceed to offer — target 190–195K, van excluded, 70/30 payment split
Conditional Go
Revenue (FY2026)
190K
EUR, flat YoY
EBITDA (mgmt basis)
49K
Year 1 post-transition, excl. MF
Target price
190K
Van excluded, 3.9x EBITDA
Equity required
38K
20% of deal, 9.5K/partner

Business Overview

Auran Pesupojat Oy is the largest carpet washing operation in the Turku region — a single-operator specialist cleaning business operating from a 270 m² industrial workshop at Iso-Heikkiläntie 4 since 2015. The core offering is professional carpet washing (mattopesu) using industrial flat-wash and drum-wash equipment: every carpet type from budget synthetic to hand-knotted silk, handled by machine or by hand. The secondary — and premium — service is boat cover (venekuomu) washing, waterproofing and mould treatment, a niche with zero local competition and customers travelling from across Finland.

The company is owned and run entirely by Asko Haahtela, who has built a loyal customer base spanning generations — organically, with less than 300€/year in marketing spend (website hosting only). The business has never needed to advertise. Thousands of individual customers, plus established B2B accounts across all service lines, most relationships 10+ years old.

Financials are clean: no debt, consistent profitability over four years, and cash on the balance sheet. The business is being sold via broker Suomen Yrityskaupat Oy. Asko is retiring and is willing to transition over up to 12 months at 4,000€/month, training incoming staff. He has no plans to set up a competing operation.

Location: The building (originally a bread factory) has exceptional electrical infrastructure. The landlord has made serious long-term investments — dedicated heating plant, ongoing renovations — and operates a golf simulator in the adjacent space. There is potential for expansion into that adjacent area. Long-term tenancy since 2015 indicates landlord stability.

Services

ServiceMethodPricingNotes
Carpet washing — flat wash (laakapesu)Catinet flat-wash line + centrifuge12.90–22.90 €/m²Oriental, wool, silk, synthetic, natural fibre rugs
Carpet washing — drum washElectrolux drum washers12.90 €/m²Cotton and rag rugs
Boat cover cleaning + waterproofingSpecialised mould removal + impregnation~25 €/m²Service since 1993; national demand; no local competition
Home textiles — duvets, pillows, mattressesLarge drum washers18–85 €/itemAll sizes; mattress pads washed whole
Sheets — washed & mangledDrum wash + mangle7 €/kg (min. 6 kg)Flat linen service
Corporate textilesAll methodsBy quoteAdvertising tents, banners, commercial carpets

Revenue mix

SegmentEst. shareEst. revenueNotes
B2C — general cleaning & laundry~70%~134KRecurring, walk-in and contracted
B2C/B2B — boat covers>10%~20K+Growing niche; limited competition nationally
B2B — commercial clients~20%~38KClient list to be confirmed at DD. Asko is retiring — no compete risk.
Total~192K

Premises

Lease with Kiinteistöyhtymä Lahtonen, running since December 2015. Rent: 2,000€/month (24,000€/year) including heating. Electricity and water billed at consumption. The lease is rolling with a 6-month mutual notice period. CPI-indexed annually. The lease was originally signed under Acotim Oy Lieto / Auran Pesupojat — this name discrepancy requires clarification, though it is not expected to be an issue in a share deal structure.

Financial History

All figures EUR thousands. Fiscal year Feb 1 – Jan 31. Sheet labels lag calendar year by one month.

Line item FY2023 FY2024 FY2025 FY2026
Revenue165180192190
Materials & services−9−8−7−8
Personnel costs−89−91−91−97
Other opex−44−49−46−49
EBITDA23324837
EBITDA margin14%18%25%19%
Depreciation−7−10−8−6
EBIT16224131
Net profit13183324

Revenue grew at ~5% CAGR from FY2023 to FY2025 before plateauing in FY2026. FY2025 was the peak earnings year (48K EBITDA, 25% margin). FY2026 margin compression was driven by a 6.6K increase in personnel costs with flat revenue — a one-year anomaly rather than a structural shift. The business has no debt and carried 26K cash at year-end FY2026.

Forecast — Askel Management Basis

Opco (Auran Pesupojat) P&L under Askel ownership. Management fee is a cash-routing mechanism to holdco (TripleH/Askel Ventures) and nets to zero in consolidation. EBITDA excl. MF represents the true operational earnings.

Line item 2026E 2027E 2028E 2029E 2030E
Opco
Revenue (incl. Melers +10K)200210221232243
Materials & services−8−8−8−9−9
Personnel (transition → stable)−94−83−87−91−96
Other opex−49−51−53−56−59
EBITDA excl. MF4968737679
EBITDA margin excl. MF25%33%33%33%33%
Management fee to holdco−50−50−50−75−75
EBITDA incl. MF (opco retained)−1182314
Opco cash EoY2437535357
Holdco (TripleH / Askel Ventures)
MF revenue5050507575
Holdco costs−10−10−10−10−10
Financing costs−10−10−8−6−5
Tax−6−5−6−11−11
Holdco net income2425264849
Holdco cash EoY8124254771
Bank loan balance1521271017651

Assumptions: 5% annual revenue growth from 2027; personnel stabilises at 83K post-Asko (2027+); Melers synergy +10K confirmed from day 1; MF 50K years 1–3, 75K years 4–5, 100K year 6+.

Thesis Match

CriterionAskel thesisAuran Pesupojat standaloneAs Melers plug-in
Revenue 400K–1.5M EUR Miss — 190K Partial — combined Melers + Pesupojat approaches threshold
Profit 100K+ Miss — 49K adjusted EBITDA excl. MF Partial — combined opco EBITDA moves materially closer
Asking price Max 1M Pass — 190K Pass
Company age 10+ year Oy Pass — est. 2015, 11 years Pass
Sector Laundromats, cleaners, waste Pass — textile cleaning specialist Pass — direct sector adjacency to Melers
Geography Finland Pass — Turku Pass — same city as Melers

Follow-on rationale — Melers Oy

On a standalone basis, Auran Pesupojat falls below Askel's revenue and profit thresholds. The investment is proposed as a follow-on acquisition to Melers Oy, Askel's existing industrial laundry operation in Turku. The two businesses operate in directly adjacent niches, serve overlapping customer segments, and are located in the same city.

The following synergies support the combined case:

Valuation

Entry multiple — three views
EV / LTM EBITDA (FY2026, reported)5.1x
190K / 37K — what you pay for what exists today
EV / adjusted EBITDA (mgmt basis, yr 1)3.9x
190K / 49K — normalised for Askel ownership, Melers synergy in
EV / stabilised EBITDA (2027E, post-transition)2.8x
190K / 68K — earnings power once Asko is out and personnel normalises
Year-1 cash-on-cash return63%
24K net income / 38K equity — primary return metric
Broker ask vs. Askel target
Broker formal ask210K
Seller implied price~200K
Van removal (agreed)−20K
Askel target190–195K
Walk-away price200K
Financing structure
Bank loan (80%)152K
Finnvera guarantee (70%)106K
Equity (20%)38K
Equity per partner (4)9.5K
Personal guarantee / partner~15K
Payment terms
At closing (70%)133K
On Asko exit (30%)57K
Max Asko transition12 months
Loan term6 years
Loan fully repaid2032

Growth Upside & Competitive Moat

The base case uses conservative 5% annual revenue growth. Current machines can comfortably handle double the current revenue — drying capacity is the only soft constraint, solvable by converting available storage space. Five specific levers exist to accelerate growth, all independent of major capital investment.

1. Boat cover cleaning — national brand opportunity

Currently >10% of revenue (~20K+) with zero marketing. Customers travel from across Finland because the service is genuinely scarce — the boat cover programme has been running since 1993 and there is no equivalent operator with comparable equipment and expertise on the south-west coast. Askel's digital marketing capability could convert this into a national brand. Even capturing demand from three or four major coastal cities would double this segment. Highest-margin, lowest-competition growth lever in the business.

2. Transport service — 1,000€/month uncaptured

There is weekly customer demand for carpet pickup and delivery that the business currently doesn't offer. Asko estimates this alone could generate ~1,000€/month of incremental revenue. A single logistics hire or partnership would unlock this immediately, and it's trivially marketable via the existing website.

3. Zero marketing — massive white space

Current marketing spend: <300€/year (website hosting). Social media presence: none. Local SEO: minimal. The business has been running entirely on word-of-mouth for a decade — which speaks to quality but means almost no new customer acquisition. A small investment in Google Ads, social proof content, and an online booking form would likely double inbound enquiries.

4. Structural tailwinds

Finnish dog ownership (~800,000 dogs) drives persistent demand for deep carpet cleaning. As rental apartments increasingly come without carpets, the premium private-home carpet segment — the most price-insensitive — becomes more concentrated. Both trends favour a specialist operator over general laundromats.

5. Melers synergy

Askel's Melers industrial washing facility already generates 10K in confirmed synergy by internalising carpet and textile cleaning currently outsourced to third parties. This is in the base case. Additional cross-selling between Melers and Pesupojat clients is possible and not yet modelled.

Competitive moat

The 200K+ startup cost is not a looming capex obligation — it is a barrier to entry. There is essentially no functional used market for specialist carpet washing equipment (much is custom-made). No Finnish vocational training programme exists for this trade — knowledge is artisanal and takes years to acquire. A new competitor in Turku would need 200K+ in capital, a large industrial space, and 2–3 years to ramp. This is structural protection, not luck.

Market & Competitive Landscape

Market context

Carpet washing in Finland is a fragmented cottage industry — a handful of specialists in each city, no national chains, no VC-backed rollup. The total addressable market in the Turku region (pop. ~200K) is modest but predictable: carpets need washing every 1–3 years; boat covers need annual maintenance; home textiles have no self-service alternative. The demand profile is structurally recurring and largely weather-agnostic for the core carpet business.

Pricing in the segment has held up well — Turku operators are broadly aligned at 13–17€/m² for standard flat wash, with specialists charging up to 23€/m² for premium materials. There is no meaningful price compression risk from online platforms or new formats.

Turku competitors

OperatorEst.OfferingPricingThreat level
Turun Kotipesula Oy
Ruunikkokatu 3, Turku
1992 Carpets (flat wash, drum wash), home textiles. Specialist operator, similar positioning to Pesupojat. Flat wash 16.80 €/m² (all-in). Drum wash 33–43 €/machine. Direct
Viherpesu Oy
Turku
Full-service commercial laundry (workwear, restaurant linen, mats). Carpets are one of many product lines, not a focus. B2B pricing, contract-based. Indirect
Clean Pesulapalvelut
Raisio (relocated 2024)
~2006 General textile cleaning — primarily clothing/dry cleaning. Recent relocation may indicate instability. Carpet washing is marginal. Clothing-focused pricing, not comparable. Peripheral
24 Pesula
Multiple Turku locations
Self-service laundromats with flat-wash machines for hard-base rugs. DIY model, lower quality, no specialist cleaning. Self-service pricing, no labour component. Different segment
Pesula Sani Oy
Turku
General laundry. Subcontracts carpet washing — does not operate own equipment. Potential referral source. Non-competitor

Regional comparable — Salon Mattopesupojat Oy

Salon Mattopesupojat Oy (est. 1985, Salo, ~50km east of Turku) is the closest sector comparable — same service mix (carpets, boat covers, sails, furniture textiles), same regional market, 30+ years of operation. At 3.5× the revenue of Auran Pesupojat with 7 employees, their financials are instructive:

Salon MattopesupojatAuran Pesupojat
Revenue (2024)689K190K
Operating result−53K (−7.7%)+31K (+16%)
Employees71
Revenue per FTE~99K~190K

The contrast is striking. Scaling in this sector does not improve margins — it appears to destroy them. Salon Mattopesupojat lost 147K in 2023 and 53K in 2024 on nearly 700K of revenue. Auran Pesupojat earns 31K EBIT on 190K. The single-operator structure is not a fragility to engineer away; it is the reason the economics work. The hiring question for Askel is not "how do we scale staff" but "how do we find one excellent person and keep headcount at 1–2."

Boat cover cleaning — national

No dedicated national boat cover washing specialist was identified. The closest comparables are cover manufacturers with incidental cleaning services (MP-Venekuomu, Venetex/Nauvo) — these are repair-first operations, not cleaning specialists. Auran Pesupojat has been running dedicated boat cover programmes since 1993, with a purpose-built mould treatment + waterproofing process. This is effectively a national monopoly in a niche with genuine demand across Finland's 300,000+ registered boats.

SWOT

Strengths
  • Largest specialist carpet wash operation in Turku
  • 200K+ barrier to entry — equipment moat is structural
  • Boat cover cleaning since 1993 — national niche, no meaningful competitor
  • Zero debt, 26K cash on balance sheet
  • Multigenerational loyal customer base built with <300€/yr marketing
  • Catinet core machinery 8–10 years old, 15–20yr lifespan; active reinvestment ongoing
  • Capacity to handle 2× current revenue with existing equipment
  • ~190K revenue per FTE — exceptional labour productivity
  • Melers synergy (10K confirmed), more uncaptured
Weaknesses
  • 100% key-person dependency on Asko
  • Zero marketing infrastructure — no social, no SEO, no online booking
  • Transport service not offered despite ~1K/month confirmed demand
  • Rolling 6-month lease — no long-term location security
  • Revenue plateau FY2026 (flat vs FY2025)
  • No SOPs or operational documentation — knowledge lives in Asko's head
  • Boat cover revenue is seasonal (spring/autumn concentration)
  • Older supplementary Electrolux machines (1990s, still operational but aging)
Opportunities
  • Transport/pickup service — ~1K/month uncaptured, trivially executable
  • Digital marketing — near-zero cost, white space, no current presence
  • Boat cover national brand — largest coastal market in Europe, no competitor
  • Double revenue with no capex — only drying space is a soft constraint
  • ~800,000 dogs in Finland — persistent deep-clean demand driver
  • B2B expansion: advertising tents, hospitality, maritime sector
  • Melers cross-sell and logistics consolidation beyond confirmed 10K synergy
  • Premises expansion into adjacent space (currently golf simulator)
Threats
  • Lease termination — 6-month rolling, relocation would be costly and disruptive
  • Key-hire risk during transition — wrong hire destroys customer experience
  • Turun Kotipesula (est. 1992) — only meaningful local direct competitor; similar core offering
  • 24 Pesula self-service expansion — captures price-sensitive basic carpet segment
  • New housing trends: fewer wall-to-wall carpets reduces baseline demand long-term
  • Well-capitalised new entrant (low probability given 200K barrier + skill gap, but not zero)

Equipment Inventory

Source: inventory memo provided by Asko Haahtela, March 2026. Three Catinet machines are the operational backbone — combined installed cost >80,000 € incl. VAT.

EquipmentYearNotes
Catinet flat washer (tasopesukone)2016Max working width 300 cm, integrated roller press. ~25 m²/hr capacity for suitable carpets.
Catinet tube centrifuge — large20181800 rpm, 250 cm drum length. Removes wash water before drying.
Catinet tube centrifuge — medium2018300 cm drum length. 3 Catinet units combined cost >80K incl. VAT.
Electrolux drum washer — 28 kgJul 2023New addition; handles large textiles and mattress pads.
Esteri Quatro dryerJan 2024New addition.
Taplet Sahara Eko dryerSep 2023New addition.
Kärcher pressure washer2025New addition; boat cover pre-treatment.
Electrolux drum washers — various1990s+Multiple sizes. Still operational. Workhorses for standard drum wash.
Horizontal centrifugeOlderLarge drum, well-maintained. Handles mattress pads.
Electrolux drum dryer — 600LHigh-capacity drying for large items.
Crane, 250 kg capacityFor lifting heavy carpets.
Jun-Air compressors (×2)2016, 2018Quiet operation; well-maintained.
VW Transporter van, 2016, 67,500 km2016Full service history — not included in deal.

Two Lakeuden Kylmätekniikka units currently not operational — minor only, not core to production. Substantial supporting infrastructure: stainless steel work tables, rolling benches, specialized carpet transport carts, shelving.

Risk Assessment

RiskSeverityMitigation
Key-person — Asko Haahtela
The entire business runs on one person. Operations, B2B relationships, institutional knowledge.
High 12-month transition, Asko trains incoming staff. 30% of price withheld until exit. Mitigated but not eliminated.
B2B client retention (~38K revenue)
20% of revenue is commercial. Retention risk exists post-Asko departure.
Medium Asko is retiring — no competing business. Client list and contract status to be confirmed at DD stage. 12-month transition helps retain relationships.
Staff transition speed
Model assumes 6-month Asko overlap. If hiring takes 10–12 months, year-1 personnel costs rise ~27K, compressing EBITDA.
Medium 25K opco cash buffer absorbs this. Start recruitment process before close to minimise lag.
Lease continuity
Rolling 6-month notice. Landlord could terminate. Name discrepancy (Acotim Oy) on current lease document.
Medium Request landlord estoppel letter or written lease confirmation as closing condition. Clarify Acotim name. 10+ year relationship is positive signal.
Revenue plateau
FY2026 revenue dipped slightly vs. FY2025. Growth was Asko-constrained, not market-constrained — but needs validation.
Low Melers synergy (+10K) and boat cover digitisation provide near-term organic upside. Model conservatively assumes 5%/year.
Equipment capex — 200K replacement cost
Book value 16K (near fully depreciated). 200K replacement cost confirmed — but this is the cost to build a NEW competing operation from scratch, not an imminent replacement obligation. Core Catinet machines (installed 2016–2018, >80K installed cost) have a 15–20yr expected lifespan; at 8–10 years old, they have significant runway. Recent investments show active maintenance: 28kg Electrolux washer (July 2023), Esteri Quatro dryer (Jan 2024), Kärcher pressure washer (2025), Taplet Sahara Eko (Sep 2023). Older Electrolux drum washers from the 1990s still operational.
Low–Med Equipment inventory with installation dates received from Asko. Core machinery (Catinet flat-wash line, two centrifuges) is 8–10 years old, roughly halfway through expected life. Pattern of ongoing reinvestment is positive. No wholesale replacement expected within the investment horizon. Independent condition assessment remains a sensible DD step but is no longer a blocking risk.

Due Diligence Status

Completed
4 years of audited financial statements (FY2023–FY2026) reviewed
Interim P&L through Aug 2025 reviewed
Lease agreement reviewed — key terms confirmed
Broker materials reviewed and benchmarked
Van exclusion confirmed with broker/seller
Transition terms confirmed (4K/month, 12-month max)
Melers synergy (10K) confirmed as real, already visible
Financial model built and stress-tested
Site visits completed — premises inspected twice
Seller motivation confirmed — Asko retiring, no competing business planned
Pending
Equipment inventory with installation dates and costs received from Asko (March 2026)
Independent equipment condition assessment (recommended but no longer blocking)
Tax DD — open disputes, VAT compliance, TyEL status
Landlord estoppel / lease name (Acotim) clarification
B2B client list and contract status
Financing term sheet (Momentum, to be approached first)
Customer concentration — any single client >10%?
Boat cover revenue detail and seasonality profile

Open Questions for IC

Summary

Auran Pesupojat is a well-run, debt-free, cash-generating micro-business with ten years of operational history in Turku. It fits Askel's acquisition thesis — profitable, overlooked, and with a motivated seller willing to support a clean transition. The financials are transparent and the deal structure is straightforward.

At 190–195K (3.9x year-1 EBITDA), the entry price is fair. The return profile is strong: 24K net income to equity in year 1 on a 38K equity investment (63% cash-on-cash), loan fully repaid by 2032, and an optionality upside in the boat cover segment that is currently untapped.

The main risk is key-person concentration. This is partially mitigated by the structured 12-month transition, deferred payment, and confirmed retirement (no compete). The equipment narrative has been substantially clarified: the 200K figure is the cost to build a competing operation from scratch, not an imminent replacement obligation. Core machinery is 8–10 years old with an expected 15–20yr lifespan and active ongoing reinvestment. The 200K is a competitive moat, not a liability.

Upside is underappreciated: zero marketing, double the capacity headroom, a transport service nobody is offering, and a boat cover niche with national reach and no local competitor. The business is quietly exceptional.

Recommendation: authorise offer at 190K, ceiling 195K, conditional on (a) independent equipment condition assessment and (b) completion of tax DD and lease confirmation.